(Last) Sunday’s Discussion Question Revisited
Wherein I finally reveal my answer (spoiler: it is hardly surprising). And, also, wherein despite the goal of brevity, I fail at that goal.
Wherein I finally reveal my answer (spoiler: it is hardly surprising). And, also, wherein despite the goal of brevity, I fail at that goal.
The people want a fast trial and think he’s guilty and should go to jail.
A surpringly large number tuned in to see people who won’t be the nominee.
Vivek Ramaswamy’s national coming out party was, well, interesting.
The Establishment is desperate for an alternative that’s not coming.
tl;dr: Trump is a nightmare client & nightmare clients don’t do well in criminal courts
With the help of Popehat, I call out issues with the Fulton County case &, in doing so, piss everyone off
The electorate is less alarmed than it was four years ago. Which is good!
Why “the First Amendment protects Trump” defense doesn’t make sense
It’s not nearly as far-fetched as most of us would like to believe.
The former President has a 50 point lead. Is he unstoppable?
The North Dakota governor really, really wants to be on TV.
The problem is not the indictment; it is the indicted.
When a go-to “nonpartisan” defender breaks rank does that change your opinion?
Thinking about what is predictive as well as the usefulness of historical case studies.
Shockingly, the current President’s numbers are worse than his predecessor’s.
Perfect timing, it would seem.
Virginia’s governor is reportedly taking a shot at the 2024 Republican nomination.