President Donald Trump, flanked by Vice President JD Vance and FIFA President Gianni Infantino, announces that the FIFA World Cup 2025 draw will take place on December 5 at the Kennedy Center, Friday, August 22, 2025
Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok

FIFA Overturns Balogun Suspension At Trump’s Urging

A small injustice righted at the expense of a larger one.

38

Comments

NYT (“Trump Asked FIFA to Review U.S. Player’s Suspension. Now He’s Eligible to Play.“):

President Trump called Gianni Infantino, the president of FIFA, in the hours after the United States men’s soccer team played Wednesday and asked him to review the suspension of the team’s top goal scorer in the World Cup, Folarin Balogun, after he was given a red card, according to four people familiar with the conversation.

On Sunday, FIFA reversed the suspension, announcing that Mr. Balogun would be eligible to play Monday against Belgium.

The reversal is highly unusual and is the first time since 1962 that FIFA has allowed a player to appear in a game when they would have been suspended after being sent off in the World Cup. Mr. Infantino has spent years trying to curry favor with Mr. Trump. Last year, FIFA created and gave Mr. Trump the FIFA Peace Prize amid the president’s public, but failed, campaign to win the Nobel Peace Prize.

Shortly after Mr. Balogun’s red card, senior Trump administration officials, including Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary, and Andrew Giuliani, the executive director of the White House task force on the World Cup, engaged lawyers to help the U.S. Soccer Federation try to appeal, despite FIFA’s rules against such appeals, according to two of the people familiar with the call.

U.S. Soccer officials argued the red card was improperly given to Mr. Balogun because the officials should not have used slow-motion video replay in determining the penalty, the people said. Use of video replays is common practice, and players have frequently been ejected after reviews.

Scott Goodwin, a hedge fund manager and major donor to U.S. Soccer, brought to the attention of Trump officials public accusations that Raphael Claus, the referee, was involved in match fixing in Brazil by giving out irregular red cards. Brazilian authorities and FIFA have found no evidence of wrongdoing by Mr. Claus, but Mr. Trump brought up those allegations in his call with Mr. Infantino, the people familiar with the call said. Mr. Goodwin referred comment to U.S. Soccer. Mr. Claus did not initially call a foul on Mr. Balogun but was asked to review his decision by other officials tasked with monitoring replays. That group hailed from Venezuela, Colombia and France.

POLITICO (“‘Shame on you’: Belgium accuses FIFA of caving to Trump ahead of World Cup clash“):

Belgian politicians and soccer officials were outraged Sunday after FIFA ditched a one-match ban for American star Folarin Balogun that would have ruled him out of the U.S.-Belgium World Cup round-of-16 matchup on Monday.

President Donald Trump immediately thanked FIFA on his Truth Social platform after the controversial decision was announced, for “for doing what was right, and reversing a great injustice!” Shortly after FIFA’s bombshell, the New York Times reported that Trump has called FIFA chief Gianni Infantino on Wednesday and asked him to review Balogun’s suspension.

Balogun was originally suspended for one match after being sent off against Bosnia and Herzegovina during the first knockout round. While many soccer pundits thought the red card was harsh, there is little precedent for a player not serving a further suspension after being ordered off during a tournament.

In a statement Sunday, the world soccer governing body said: “In line with article 27 of the FIFA Disciplinary Code, the implementation of the match suspension is suspended for a probationary period of one year.”

The Belgian football association said it was “astonished” by the decision to overturn the suspension. “In order to safeguard the legitimate rights of all participating teams and to protect the fundamental principles of fair play in our sport, both at this FIFA World Cup and at future editions of the tournament, the RBFA is investigating all potential options,” the association noted.

Senior politicians from across Belgium reacted with bafflement.

“True strength lies in winning with fair play (and by following all the rules). That’s what Belgium will do tomorrow. Full support for the Royal Belgian FA, which announced tonight that it is exploring all possibilities to protect the legitimate rights of all participants as well as the fundamental principles of fair play that govern soccer during this World Cup,” said Jacqueline Galant, Walloon sports minister from the French-speaking liberal Reformist Movement.

“Shame on you! When money calls the shots, the World Cup loses all credibility. Adapting the rules to please Trump, trying to cheat to win—what a deplorable image for FIFA, for the soccer World Cup, and for the United States. Rules must be respected by everyone, in sports as in life,” the opposition Socialist party said in a statement.

Because I’m an early riser and poor sleeper, I missed the match along with all the other late-night matches played by Team USA this tournament. (I did watch the 2-0 victory over Australia in group play.) From replay, the foul looked unintentional and therefore not deserving of a red card. It was awarded based on a slow-motion replay system that has been widely criticized and has led to other suspensions, none of which were overturned.

Controversial calls by game officials are a part of sports. I’m still salty about an overturned catch in a 2015 playoff game. But officiating is a necessary part of the game, officials are human beings making tough decisions under enormous pressure, and players and fans have to accept the outcome and move on.

Like many international bodies, FIFA is notoriously corrupt. But, to my knowledge, that has not typically extended to the pitch. Absent evidence that Claus made the call in other than good faith—and I know of none—the suspension should have stood. As pleased as I am that our best scorer of the tournament will be eligible to play, the Belgians are rightly outraged. And, should Team USA advance, the victory will be somewhat tainted as a result of this move.

,

38 responses to “FIFA Overturns Balogun Suspension At Trump’s Urging”

  1. Oh shit.

    It was too much to hope that he’d stay out of the World Cup matches.

    5
  2. Charley in Cleveland Avatar
    Charley in Cleveland

    Looks like the Epstein Class (Trump, Lutnik, et al.) believes that in the World Cup, as in life, the rules only apply to the little people. And here I thought Infantino’s most embarrassing gesture would forever be creating and awarding the laughable FIFA Peace Prize to Trump.

    4
  3. Don’t leave out the reality that FIFA’s instructions to the referees before this WC was the only thing making Balogun’s play a red card in the first place. They took away the ability of a ref to make a judgement call…. and IMHO 99.7% of the time, without those directions, ref would have made the correct call of a thing that didn’t deserve a card.
    The play was 0% deliberate – Balogun didn’t see him before putting his leg out & transferring weight bc the opponent ran in from his blind spot.
    FIFA’s instructions for just this WC stated that studs going down leg was to be a red card with no thought allowed. That’s not the normal rules. Once the replay validated that studs went down leg, it was a red — context didn’t matter.
    IMHO overturning this was correct.. because the problem was FIFA’s instructions, not either the ref or the replay process.

    3
    1. @Gavin Thanks for that insight. I’d read a few articles about this before Trump’s intervention, but had gathered that the main problem was the frame-by-frame breakdown rather than the instructions.

      Retroactively applying common sense is a good thing. But it’s problematic that they’ve only done it in this one instance, at the urging of the host’s head of state.

      2
    2. @Gavin: In some ways, it is all made worse by the way the whole tournament has been called. I will admit to being a casual fan, but overall, they appear to be letting the players get away with a lot of pushing, shirt-grabbing, and so forth. As such, a red for what was clearly accidental was unjust. Plus, there have been other, more violent collisions that have resulted in nothing, let alone a red card.

      1. Charley in Cleveland Avatar
        Charley in Cleveland

        Both the NBA and the NHL playoff officiating was suspect in that actions that are fouls in the regular season are tolerated in the playoffs under the pretense of “letting the players play.” The idea of letting the players rather than the officials determine the outcome is laudable, but not when the rules are so distorted the integrity of the game is sacrificed. The only mandate to officials should be: Call ’em like you see ’em, and we’ll have your back.

    3. Could not disagree more. Easy red card in every league around the world every game every day.

  4. Jay L. Gischer Avatar
    Jay L. Gischer

    I didn’t like the call, but I like Trump’s intervention even less. I’m sorry, all fans of Belgium out there. So sorry.

    2
  5. Everything that Trump touches turns to shit.

    Even – or perhaps especially – the fun things.

    3
  6. I agree that the card was unjust.

    But man, this is just Trump tainting the whole thing. It is gross and corrupt. And yet another way he is making the world see us as the bad guys.

    2
  7. The card was not deserved, but this intervention looks bloody awful.

    One of those cases where the cure is worse than the disease.

    Is it too much to ask for the President of the United States to stay out of every f*cking thing? Doesn’t he have ANYTHING else to do??

    1
  8. I follow football more than most. Premier League. Ligue 1. La Lagia. The Bundesliga.

    And I disagree with most of you. That’s a red card in every league every day in every game. You can’t come down on a player’s Achilles like that and expect to stay in the game.

    The suspension of the red card is an absolute disgrace, but anyone who follows the historic corruption of FIFA shouldn’t be surprised.

    2
    1. Jay L. Gischer Avatar
      Jay L. Gischer

      I expect you know more about this than me. For me, a red card is what they gave Leonardo after he fractured Tab Ramos’ skull in the 1994 World Cup round of 16. It looked pretty darn intentional. That one still burns.

      So, this one didn’t really look anything like that.

      NEVERTHELESS (and this is the point we are really making) I can accept a call by a referee and move on, whether I think it’s a good one or a bad one. It’s a disgrace to have Trump stick his oar in. This is “argument against interest” we are making.

      1. I get what you’re saying, but it was a very defensible red card.

        If there would have been a regular appeal process, it would not have been overturned, even if the referee’s decision was rather harsh.

        And that does make it worse.

        1
    2. @EddieInCA: I take the point. There is no doubt you know more about the game than I do.

      I do find it nonetheless frustrating that the ref did not even pull a yellow in real time, and the red was only assessed via VAR in slo-mo.

  9. Balogun was born in Brooklyn, New York, to Yoruba Nigerian parents. This made Balogun a US citizen. His parents were living in London, and visited New York when his mother was seven months pregnant with him. Airline staff did not allow her to board the family’s return flight to London due to safety concerns over the advanced state of her pregnancy, and Balogun was subsequently born in New York. He returned to the United Kingdom with his parents when he was two months old and grew up in London. — WIKI

    So he’s an anchor baby. And Trump is supporting him. I’m so confused.

    1
  10. Hilarious that Bolagrun is a birthright citizen and Fatso is working the refs for him!!!

  11. Corrupt organization holds tournament at a corrupt country and there’s corruption in it. Shocker.

    2
  12. Michael Reynolds Avatar
    Michael Reynolds

    Now any Team USA victory comes with an asterisk.

    6
  13. This morning trump said that the referee’s decision was horrible, and then said, “I didn’t know what the hell a red card was.”

    I feel sorry not for the Belgian fans, but for the rest of the USA fans. The only ways out of this without a shit stain on the USA’s tournament are: (a) FIFA credibly…haha… states that the red card review was conducted and decided without trump’s intervention, (b) Balogun is somehow unable to play tonight, (c) Belgium’s appeal of the red card reversal is successful, or (d) Belgium wins.

    Okay maybe not even (d). The stink of trump’s and FIFA’s corrupt bargain will linger, and we will be reminded of it by the gifted golden orb sitting above what appear to be the hands of the damned desperately reaching up from the depths. And the USMNT could end up in a worse place because of this—trump is bad juju, as played out when the Knicks had their 13-game playoff winning streak broken at MSG the night that he attended.

    2
    1. Michael Reynolds Avatar
      Michael Reynolds

      e) Balogun takes himself out of the game as an honorable man should.

      1
      1. Jay L. Gischer Avatar
        Jay L. Gischer

        With the team’s support, no less. Perhaps they offer a fig leaf of “he’s not feeling well” or something, to avoid stirring the pot more.

        1. Somehow I don’t think sportsmanship is going to overcome the desire to win.

          2
      2. It seems rather unfair to put the onus for fixing the corrupt behavior of Trump and Infantino/FIFA on a 25-year-old and his teammates, who are not responsible for causing the problem in the first place.

        1
        1. Michael Reynolds Avatar
          Michael Reynolds

          It’s very unfair. It’s also the only way to fix things.

        2. @Michael Reynolds: I have to admit, at least part of me hopes he does sit out, only because, as you note, it is the only way to take away the taint.

        3. “Winning isn’t everything. It’s the only thing.” Attributed to several football coaches.

          That’s the prevalent attitude in sports. Which makes a lot of sense, until you count past one and realize the vast majority of teams won’t win a given tournament.

          Few teams or even individual athletes will refuse an advantage if they’re given one, even if it’s wrong for them to have it.

      3. Not a chance, imho.
        He’d be hated to death.
        Besides which, he’s a pro footballer.
        No such is likely to give up on a world cup match.
        That’s the way it is.

        1. @JohnSF: Ultimately, that is what it boils down to–this is a likely once in a lifetime situtation.

  14. I added watching the World Cup to my bucket list this year (I had never watched soccer before in my life). So I was dismayed when Balogun received a red card for an accidental injury, but upon reading views of those supporting the call, I decided that for the sake of the sport, “rules are rules” and the US would have to prove their worth in their next match without Balogun.
    Upon learning of Trump putting his thumb on the FIFA disciplinary system, I was even more dismayed. Another reason for the world to hate us. Trump making everything, one way or the other, about himself. And if we win the US-Belgium game, it will always have a virtual asterisk rather than be an example of US pluckiness and perseverance.
    What will be telling to me is if other countries start asking for their red cards to be “reviewed.”
    All in all, a sad development for the sport, in my view.

    1
  15. dazedandconfused Avatar
    dazedandconfused

    Read up on how the president of FIFA becomes president, it’s by election of the members for a four year term, max three four year terms for any president. The current president is in the last year of his third term.

    Short timer.

    ETA: A meme…

    https://x.com/FlockePaul/status/2073883886531002753

  16. So I guess the FIFA Fake Peace Prize award to Trump just wasn’t enough?

    Basically, Trump ruins everything.

  17. The red card was arguable.
    But the red card was given.
    Therefore the rules are suspension for one match.
    Voiding the rules in that respect is extremely dodgy.
    (As a rugby fan, my opinion is that the foul rules in football are crap anyway, but that’s just me.)

    1. (As a rugby fan, my opinion is that the foul rules in football are crap anyway, but that’s just me.)

      League or Union?

  18. Once again, Trump just has to make himself the main actor in any drama.
    The amusing thing is that UEFA and that corrupt git Sepp Blatter get to take the moral high ground.
    Dear me.
    (imho Belgium are still likely to demolish the USA no matter who plays or doesn’t)

    2
  19. Ball don’t lie.

    4-1 Belgium

    2
  20. Now, what did i say?
    lol

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending