The networks are calling New Hampshire and its four electors for President Obama. That’s crucial because even if Romney were to win Florida, Virginia, and Ohio, he would only reach 266 Electoral votes. New Hampshire was one of the semi-plausible paths to 270. The only remaining path with even the shred of plausibility, then, is Florida, Virginia, Ohio, and Colorado. It’s more likely that Obama takes all four than that Romney does.
Obama Wins New Hampshire; Romney Needs to Run Table
6
Comments
Categories
Tags
6 responses to “Obama Wins New Hampshire; Romney Needs to Run Table”
-
Well, it isn’t over but it doesn’t look hopeful. I guess there is no hope for change. Barring a big surprise it appears people have voted for free stuff instead of free enterprise.
Those who went for Obama will have to answer to their children. David Mamet asked the questions on Nov 1 that will haunt some. I’ve no children so the far future is of less concern, although I’ve nothing to justify in my choice.
Irrespective of your endorsement of liberal sentiments, of fairness and “more equal distribution,” will you explain to your children that top-down economic policies will increasingly limit their ability to find challenging and well-paid work, and that the diminution in employment and income will decrease their opportunity to marry and raise children?
-
-
@JKB:
How is purchasing health insurance getting free stuff?
Latest Posts
-
Mamdani Uses October 7 Anniversary to Attack Israel
-
In Front of Our Noses: “I can do whatever I want, if I want.”
-
Polling Anomalies
-
An Alternative Explanation for Trump’s ‘Take Out Los Angeles’ Quip
-
The Kamala Konundrum
-
Trump: Losing Los Angeles or San Diego ‘Small Price to Pay’ for Iran War
-
Why the Courts Reign Supreme
-
Hegseth’s Speech: Very Little on Iran, But A Lot of Christian Nationalism